> On 1 Sep 2018, at 15:48, AUDRAIN LUC <LAUDRAIN@hachette-livre.fr <mailto:LAUDRAIN@hachette-livre.fr>> wrote: > > Hi Garth, > > These questions should be raised within the next PBG calls. I agree it is very important and I associate to this the questions that Liisa raised also for the PBG agenda. I don’t know if they were discussed on last call. > > On TPAC attendance for PBG members, how can we know? Ivan, is there a list of TPAC attendees that we could use to compare ? The results https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35125/TPAC2018/results <https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35125/TPAC2018/results> are available; at the very end of the page there is a list of the registrants. There are over 400, so it is a bit tedious to compare, though. > > On the same lists subjects, shouldn’t we receive a list of IDPF TPI registered from W3C management? Ralph has them. Copying this to him explicitly to raise his attention:-) Ivan > > Not far from the beach in Guernsey, > Best, > Luc > > Le 28 août 2018 à 16:18, Garth Conboy <garth@google.com <mailto:garth@google.com>> a écrit : > >> Hi Liisa, Luc, and Publishing BG SC Folks, >> >> The Web Publishing WG is meeting Monday and Tuesday @ TPAC. >> >> We have a tentative agenda item of: >> >> Business >> Group Feedback - grounded in use cases, requirements >> >> >> Tzviya, Ivan and I feel it is very important to have this be a successful working session, to receive and discuss input and desired directions from the BG to the >> WG. >> >> >> Is there a good understanding of BG attendance at TPAC? How best should this session be promoted with an expectation of substantive feedback? >> >> >> Best, >> Garth >> ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Publishing@W3C Technical Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ <http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/> mobile: +31-641044153 ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704 <https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704>
Received on Sunday, 2 September 2018 09:12:56 UTC