W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > November 2012

Re: PROV-N responses

From: Luc Moreau <l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2012 07:44:16 +0000
Message-ID: <EMEW3|28b8f867f3304442bc6043ac392a681eoA07iK08l.moreau|ecs.soton.ac.uk|50922850.2060301@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
To: "public-prov-wg@w3.org" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Dear all,
Following Bob's acknowledgement, all the following issues are now closed.
Luc

On 10/31/2012 05:29 PM, Freimuth, Robert, Ph.D. wrote:
> Hi Paul,
> It seems many of the issues that I raised were fixed in the latest 
> draft. Details below.
>
>   * 1.3.1 ISSUE-541 (Optional Generation Time)
>     <http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ResponsesToPublicComments#ISSUE-541_.28Optional_Generation_Time.29>
>
>
> Original issue acknowledged.
> New issue:  In the current draft, the generationExpression includes 
> "...optionalIdentifier eIdentifier.." and optionalIdentifier is 
> defined as '( identifierOrMarker ";" )?'.  I believe the '?' should be 
> included in the generationExpression rather than in 
> optionalIdentifier. This may apply to other expressions as well.
>
>   * 1.3.2 ISSUE-542 (Optional Usage Time)
>     <http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ResponsesToPublicComments#ISSUE-542_.28Optional_Usage_Time.29>
>
>
> Acknowledged
>
>   * 1.3.3 ISSUE-543 (Key-Value)
>     <http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ResponsesToPublicComments#ISSUE-543_.28Key-Value.29>
>
>
> Acknowledged
>
>   * 1.3.4 ISSUE-545 (Structure of document)
>     <http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ResponsesToPublicComments#ISSUE-545_.28Structure_of_document.29>
>
>
> My personal preference would be to define the identifiers (currently 
> in 3.7.1) earlier in the doc so they appear before the definitions in 
> 3.1.x, but this is just my opinion.
>
>   * 1.3.5 ISSUE-537 (Syntax of identifiers)
>     <http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ResponsesToPublicComments#ISSUE-537_.28Syntax_of_identifiers.29>
>
>
> Resolved.  The version that I reviewed did not utilize a semicolon as 
> a separator.
>
>   * 1.3.6 ISSUE-535 (Grammar notation)
>     <http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ResponsesToPublicComments#ISSUE-535_.28Grammar_notation.29>
>
>
> Acknowledged
>
>   * 1.3.7 ISSUE-534 (Example)
>     <http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ResponsesToPublicComments#ISSUE-534_.28Example.29>
>
>
> Acknowledged
>
>   * 1.3.8 ISSUE-536 (Syntax Ambiguity and - marker)
>     <http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ResponsesToPublicComments#ISSUE-536_.28Syntax_Ambiguity_and_-_marker.29>
>
>
> Acknowledged
>
>   * 1.3.9 ISSUE-538 (Rephrasing)
>     <http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ResponsesToPublicComments#ISSUE-538_.28Rephrasing.29>
>
>
> Acknowledged
>
>   * 1.3.10 ISSUE-533 (Named Attributes)
>     <http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ResponsesToPublicComments#ISSUE-533_.28Named_Attributes.29>
>
>
> Acknowledged
>
>   * 1.3.11 ISSUE-546 (Encoding)
>     <http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ResponsesToPublicComments#ISSUE-546_.28Encoding.29>
>
>
> Acknowledged
>
>   * 1.3.12 ISSUE-540 (Production Documentation)
>     <http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ResponsesToPublicComments#ISSUE-540_.28Production_Documentation.29>
>
>
> The current draft is much improved compared to the one that I 
> reviewed.  Issue resolved.
>
>   * 1.3.13 ISSUE-539 (Production Documentation)
>     <http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ResponsesToPublicComments#ISSUE-539_.28Production_Documentation.29>
>
>
> The current draft is much improved compared to the one that I 
> reviewed.  Issue resolved.
>
>   * 1.3.14 ISSUE-544 (Change section title)
>     <http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ResponsesToPublicComments#ISSUE-544_.28Change_section_title.29>
>
>
> Acknowledged
>
> Thanks,
> Bob
>
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     *From:* pgroth@gmail.com [mailto:pgroth@gmail.com] *On Behalf Of
>     *Paul Groth
>     *Sent:* Saturday, October 27, 2012 5:34 AM
>     *To:* Freimuth, Robert, Ph.D.
>     *Cc:* public-prov-comments@w3.org
>     *Subject:* PROV-N responses
>
>     Dear Bob,
>
>     We have also gone through all your comments on PROV-N and created
>     responses for them. Can we get acknowledgement on these responses
>     as well?
>
>       * 1.3.1 ISSUE-541 (Optional Generation Time)
>         <http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ResponsesToPublicComments#ISSUE-541_.28Optional_Generation_Time.29>
>
>       * 1.3.2 ISSUE-542 (Optional Usage Time)
>         <http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ResponsesToPublicComments#ISSUE-542_.28Optional_Usage_Time.29>
>
>       * 1.3.3 ISSUE-543 (Key-Value)
>         <http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ResponsesToPublicComments#ISSUE-543_.28Key-Value.29>
>
>       * 1.3.4 ISSUE-545 (Structure of document)
>         <http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ResponsesToPublicComments#ISSUE-545_.28Structure_of_document.29>
>
>       * 1.3.5 ISSUE-537 (Syntax of identifiers)
>         <http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ResponsesToPublicComments#ISSUE-537_.28Syntax_of_identifiers.29>
>
>       * 1.3.6 ISSUE-535 (Grammar notation)
>         <http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ResponsesToPublicComments#ISSUE-535_.28Grammar_notation.29>
>
>       * 1.3.7 ISSUE-534 (Example)
>         <http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ResponsesToPublicComments#ISSUE-534_.28Example.29>
>
>       * 1.3.8 ISSUE-536 (Syntax Ambiguity and - marker)
>         <http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ResponsesToPublicComments#ISSUE-536_.28Syntax_Ambiguity_and_-_marker.29>
>
>       * 1.3.9 ISSUE-538 (Rephrasing)
>         <http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ResponsesToPublicComments#ISSUE-538_.28Rephrasing.29>
>
>       * 1.3.10 ISSUE-533 (Named Attributes)
>         <http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ResponsesToPublicComments#ISSUE-533_.28Named_Attributes.29>
>
>       * 1.3.11 ISSUE-546 (Encoding)
>         <http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ResponsesToPublicComments#ISSUE-546_.28Encoding.29>
>
>       * 1.3.12 ISSUE-540 (Production Documentation)
>         <http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ResponsesToPublicComments#ISSUE-540_.28Production_Documentation.29>
>
>       * 1.3.13 ISSUE-539 (Production Documentation)
>         <http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ResponsesToPublicComments#ISSUE-539_.28Production_Documentation.29>
>
>       * 1.3.14 ISSUE-544 (Change section title)
>         <http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ResponsesToPublicComments#ISSUE-544_.28Change_section_title.29>
>
>
>
>     Thanks again for all your help,
>     Paul
>
>     -- 
>

-- 
Professor Luc Moreau
Electronics and Computer Science   tel:   +44 23 8059 4487
University of Southampton          fax:   +44 23 8059 2865
Southampton SO17 1BJ               email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk
United Kingdom                     http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
Received on Thursday, 1 November 2012 07:44:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 1 November 2012 07:44:50 GMT