- From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 11:33:30 -0400
- To: Stephan Zednik <zednis@rpi.edu>
- Cc: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, public-prov-wg@w3.org
Stephan and WG, Given Luc's response about Dictionaries providing structure to Entities, can we go with pairKey and pairValue? Any more concerns? Thanks, Tim >> Leaning towards Luc and Stephan, what about >> >> [ >> a prov:KeyValuePair; >> prov:pairKey "goalie"; >> prov:pairValue :joe_the_tank; >> ] >> >> I think the property should be named by the role, not its range - otherwise we'd have pairString which is odd. > > I think this goes back to my preference for prov:KeyEntityPair over prov:KeyValuePair. > > Why can only entities be the value in a KeyValuePair? > > --Stephan
Received on Tuesday, 15 May 2012 15:35:06 UTC