W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > May 2012

Re: prov:value versus KeyValuePair

From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 11:35:17 -0400
Cc: Stephan Zednik <zednis@rpi.edu>, public-prov-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <0F0AAE15-A05D-47B4-966E-DFCCC661916C@rpi.edu>
To: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>

>>>>> 2) Rename DM's "value" to "chars", inspired by cnt:chars from
>>>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/Content-in-RDF10/#ContentAsTextClass
>>> -1
>>> I prefer "content" to "chars", but would prefer even more to use prov:value to be consistent with the DM.
>> I was proposing to have DM to change "value" to "content" at
>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-prov-dm-20120503/#term-attribute-value
> I feel that "content" is not really expressing what we want, when we talk
> about immediate value such as int, string, etc. It may work fine for file contents.

I agree, it's not quite right.
I much prefer keeping like rdf:value since it has had ten years to develop in practical use.

Received on Tuesday, 15 May 2012 15:36:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 15 May 2012 15:36:02 GMT