W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > March 2012

Re: unchewed gum and coupons

From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2012 09:05:38 +0000
To: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
CC: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <EMEW3|84876ff6395c9bd5237bdb0238ec6420o2G95i08L.Moreau|ecs.soton.ac.uk|1087C81D-8D3D-4638-BB80-60B7378CD0BC@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Hi Tim,
Thanks for the example.  What is Consumption? Is it a subtype of Usage?

Professor Luc Moreau
Electronics and Computer Science
University of Southampton 
Southampton SO17 1BJ
United Kingdom

On 16 Mar 2012, at 15:56, "Timothy Lebo" <lebot@rpi.edu> wrote:

> prov-wg,
> 
> Inspired by the discussions on the "opposite of generation", I put together an RDF example that I think models the two kinds of "destruction/expiration" that fulfill the missing symmetric construct to Generation.
> 
> As I hope others will start doing, I added my example to http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/Category:PROV_example
> which is organized according to the WG-approved organization described at [1].
> 
> The example's wiki page:
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/Eg-18-opposite-of-generated
> 
> The example (as it stands today):
> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/file/71a70443b308/examples/eg-18-opposite-of-generated/rdf/eg-18-opposite-of-generated.ttl
> 
> The example (as it stands $today):
> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/file/tip/examples/eg-18-opposite-of-generated/rdf/eg-18-opposite-of-generated.ttl
> 
> Does this example help the discussion?
> 
> Regards,
> Tim
> 
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/PROV_examples_-_directory_conventions
Received on Saturday, 17 March 2012 09:06:16 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:06:58 GMT