W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > March 2012

Re: unchewed gum and coupons

From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2012 10:36:16 -0400
Cc: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <A321F8DA-4E1A-44B4-9E83-49955C6B966B@rpi.edu>
To: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Consumption is intended to be the opposite of Usage, i.e. Destruction / FinalUsage.
Once consumed, it cannot be used again.

-Tim

On Mar 17, 2012, at 5:05 AM, Luc Moreau wrote:

> Hi Tim,
> Thanks for the example.  What is Consumption? Is it a subtype of Usage?
> 
> Professor Luc Moreau
> Electronics and Computer Science
> University of Southampton 
> Southampton SO17 1BJ
> United Kingdom
> 
> On 16 Mar 2012, at 15:56, "Timothy Lebo" <lebot@rpi.edu> wrote:
> 
>> prov-wg,
>> 
>> Inspired by the discussions on the "opposite of generation", I put together an RDF example that I think models the two kinds of "destruction/expiration" that fulfill the missing symmetric construct to Generation.
>> 
>> As I hope others will start doing, I added my example to http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/Category:PROV_example
>> which is organized according to the WG-approved organization described at [1].
>> 
>> The example's wiki page:
>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/Eg-18-opposite-of-generated
>> 
>> The example (as it stands today):
>> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/file/71a70443b308/examples/eg-18-opposite-of-generated/rdf/eg-18-opposite-of-generated.ttl
>> 
>> The example (as it stands $today):
>> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/file/tip/examples/eg-18-opposite-of-generated/rdf/eg-18-opposite-of-generated.ttl
>> 
>> Does this example help the discussion?
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Tim
>> 
>> 
>> [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/PROV_examples_-_directory_conventions
> 
Received on Saturday, 17 March 2012 14:36:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:06:58 GMT