W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > March 2012

Re: unchewed gum and coupons

From: Stephan Zednik <zednis@rpi.edu>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 11:21:15 -0600
Cc: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <AB802315-0B1C-4B3A-A292-A23A81453B33@rpi.edu>
To: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>

On Mar 16, 2012, at 9:55 AM, Timothy Lebo wrote:

> prov-wg,
> 
> Inspired by the discussions on the "opposite of generation", I put together an RDF example that I think models the two kinds of "destruction/expiration" that fulfill the missing symmetric construct to Generation.
> 
> As I hope others will start doing, I added my example to http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/Category:PROV_example
> which is organized according to the WG-approved organization described at [1].
> 
> The example's wiki page:
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/Eg-18-opposite-of-generated
> 
> The example (as it stands today):
> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/file/71a70443b308/examples/eg-18-opposite-of-generated/rdf/eg-18-opposite-of-generated.ttl
> 
> The example (as it stands $today):
> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/file/tip/examples/eg-18-opposite-of-generated/rdf/eg-18-opposite-of-generated.ttl
> 
> Does this example help the discussion?

+1

I like the consumption example; it allows us to describe the provenance of what caused the expiration of the entity.

I am also happy with this modeling of expiration; it is simple and to the point.

--Stephan

> 
> Regards,
> Tim
> 
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/PROV_examples_-_directory_conventions
> 
Received on Friday, 16 March 2012 17:21:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:06:58 GMT