W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > March 2012

Re: PROV-ISSUE-328 (jhao): prov:wasStartedBy and prov:wasEndedBy as the core provenance terms [PROV-O HTML]

From: Jun Zhao <jun.zhao@zoo.ox.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 14:25:34 +0000
Message-ID: <4F634D5E.2010004@zoo.ox.ac.uk>
To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
Tim,

it looks for to me.

Unless someone objects, I am planning to close the issue on Monday.

-- Jun


On 16/03/2012 14:21, Timothy Lebo wrote:
>
> On Mar 16, 2012, at 6:27 AM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
>
>> PROV-ISSUE-328 (jhao): prov:wasStartedBy and prov:wasEndedBy as the core provenance terms [PROV-O HTML]
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/328
>>
>> Raised by: Jun Zhao
>> On product: PROV-O HTML
>>
>> This is a sub-property of prov:wasAssociatedWith.
>>
>> Should it keep it as one of the core terms or as an additional term.
>
> "It is a subproperty or subclass" seems to be a reasonable rule to place it into "additional".
>
> This way, "additional" category becomes something more like "specific".
>
>>
>> I vote for it to be as a core.
>
> I updated http://aquarius.tw.rpi.edu/prov-wg/prov-o to reflect them in "additional" to see how it looks.
> Can you take a look?
>
>>
>> The same should be applied to prov:wasEndedBy.
>>
>> I think the decision should also be consistent with how we are going to treat all the subclasses of prov:Agent.
>
> I agree that these two should be consistently applied.
>
> Regards,
> Tim
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
Received on Friday, 16 March 2012 14:26:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:06:58 GMT