W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > March 2012

Re: PROV-ISSUE-328 (jhao): prov:wasStartedBy and prov:wasEndedBy as the core provenance terms [PROV-O HTML]

From: Jun Zhao <jun.zhao@zoo.ox.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 14:48:09 +0000
Message-ID: <4F6352A9.20407@zoo.ox.ac.uk>
To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
Dear all,

> it looks for to me.

I meant to say it looks good to me. Sorry for the mistyping :(
>
> Unless someone objects, I am planning to close the issue on Monday.

This still stands!

>
> -- Jun
>
>
> On 16/03/2012 14:21, Timothy Lebo wrote:
>>
>> On Mar 16, 2012, at 6:27 AM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
>> wrote:
>>
>>> PROV-ISSUE-328 (jhao): prov:wasStartedBy and prov:wasEndedBy as the
>>> core provenance terms [PROV-O HTML]
>>>
>>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/328
>>>
>>> Raised by: Jun Zhao
>>> On product: PROV-O HTML
>>>
>>> This is a sub-property of prov:wasAssociatedWith.
>>>
>>> Should it keep it as one of the core terms or as an additional term.
>>
>> "It is a subproperty or subclass" seems to be a reasonable rule to
>> place it into "additional".
>>
>> This way, "additional" category becomes something more like "specific".
>>
>>>
>>> I vote for it to be as a core.
>>
>> I updated http://aquarius.tw.rpi.edu/prov-wg/prov-o to reflect them in
>> "additional" to see how it looks.
>> Can you take a look?
>>
>>>
>>> The same should be applied to prov:wasEndedBy.
>>>
>>> I think the decision should also be consistent with how we are going
>>> to treat all the subclasses of prov:Agent.
>>
>> I agree that these two should be consistently applied.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Tim
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
Received on Friday, 16 March 2012 14:48:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:06:58 GMT