W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > March 2012

Re: PROV-ISSUE-327 (jzhao): prov:Note as a core term in prov-o.html [PROV-O HTML]

From: Jun Zhao <jun.zhao@zoo.ox.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 11:21:35 +0000
Message-ID: <4F63223F.6050201@zoo.ox.ac.uk>
To: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
CC: public-prov-wg@w3.org

We presumed core are the things most people would use when they publish 
simple provenance statements, while additional are for more niche cases.

Does it make sense to you?

-- Jun

On 16/03/2012 10:59, Luc Moreau wrote:
> Hi Jun,
> Can i turn back the question you asked about prov-dm: what is the
> meaning of core vs additional?
> I thought we wanted to stay away from this kind of terminology.
> Luc
> On 03/16/2012 10:16 AM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
>> Should it be a core term or additional term?
Received on Friday, 16 March 2012 11:22:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:58:13 UTC