W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > March 2012

Re: PROV-ISSUE-327 (jzhao): prov:Note as a core term in prov-o.html [PROV-O HTML]

From: Jun Zhao <jun.zhao@zoo.ox.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 11:21:35 +0000
Message-ID: <4F63223F.6050201@zoo.ox.ac.uk>
To: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
CC: public-prov-wg@w3.org
Luc,

We presumed core are the things most people would use when they publish 
simple provenance statements, while additional are for more niche cases.

Does it make sense to you?

-- Jun

On 16/03/2012 10:59, Luc Moreau wrote:
> Hi Jun,
>
> Can i turn back the question you asked about prov-dm: what is the
> meaning of core vs additional?
> I thought we wanted to stay away from this kind of terminology.
>
> Luc
>
> On 03/16/2012 10:16 AM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
>> Should it be a core term or additional term?
>
Received on Friday, 16 March 2012 11:22:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:06:58 GMT