W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > April 2012

Re: PROV-ISSUE-205 (optional-activity-in-generation-record): optional activity in generation record [prov-dm]

From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 14:56:34 +0000
To: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
CC: "public-prov-wg@w3.org" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <EMEW3|57b37e8923f832d014930ecedf770bb7o3JFub08L.Moreau|ecs.soton.ac.uk|154198F6-69BC-4FFA-AAA9-E130C6F3C6F3@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Yes it is, see definition in DM.

Professor Luc Moreau
Electronics and Computer Science
University of Southampton
Southampton SO17 1BJ
United Kingdom


On 20 Apr 2012, at 14:59, "Timothy Lebo" <lebot@rpi.edu> wrote:

> What is the resolution of the issue?
> That it will not be included?
> 
> -Tim
> 
> On Apr 19, 2012, at 6:37 PM, Luc Moreau wrote:
> 
>> Dear all,
>> With WD5 about to be released, I now propose to close this issue.
>> Regards,
>> Luc
>> 
>> On 21/12/11 21:57, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
>>> PROV-ISSUE-205 (optional-activity-in-generation-record): optional activity in generation record [prov-dm]
>>> 
>>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/205
>>> 
>>> Raised by: Luc Moreau
>>> On product: prov-dm
>>> 
>>> 
>>> We may want to assert the time at which an entity is created. The placeholder for such time information is a generation record. But a generation mandates the presence of an activity identifier. But it may not be known.
>>> 
>>> It would be nice if the activity identifier was made optional in the generation record.
>>> 
>>> Does this have implications for the ontology?
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> Luc
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
Received on Friday, 20 April 2012 14:57:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:07:03 GMT