Re: PROV-O ready for internal WG review - due 9 April.

I don't think they now have anything to do with agent/attribution.

Professor Luc Moreau
Electronics and Computer Science
University of Southampton
Southampton SO17 1BJ
United Kingdom


On 20 Apr 2012, at 15:25, "Timothy Lebo" <lebot@rpi.edu> wrote:

> Shouldn't wasEndedBy and wasStartedBy be sub properties of wasAttributedTo?
> 
> 
> I think this also brings up a more general question, Stian.
> With the ease of "toggling" properties around the hierarchy, it would be nice to have owl:Annotations that justify why one is a sub prop of another, referencing the appropriate dm or dm-constraints anchors.
> 
> Any interest in trying that out?
> 
> Thanks,
> Tim
> 
> On Apr 19, 2012, at 4:56 AM, Luc Moreau wrote:
> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 04/19/2012 09:49 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
>>> Seems Tim beat me too it.. but now the question are of the unqualified
>>> properties.
>>> 
>> yes, he sent a message last night.
>>> They are currently subproperties of prov:wasAssociatedWith (range
>>> prov:Agent) - but I no longer read that understanding from DM.
>>> 
>>> 
>> Correct, no agent any more.  It's start/end are part of component 1, whereas agent is in component 3.
>> 
>>> So I've made them as well be simple subproperties of prov:involved
>>> with range prov:Entity. I'm also checking the ProvRDF page.
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> I think that would be right.
>>> Luc, just to check as there are currently a bit of a mess of versions
>>> of DM in Mercurial, [1] is right?
>>> 
>> 
>> Yes, that's the latest, ... and right as far as I can tell ;-)
>> Luc
>> 
>>> [1]  http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/prov-dm.html#dfn-wasstartedby
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 09:33, Stian Soiland-Reyes
>>> <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>  wrote:
>>> 
>>>> You are absolutely right. I'll fix that.
>>>> 
>>>> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 08:52, Luc Moreau<L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>  wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Hi prov-o team,
>>>>> 
>>>>> I don't know whether this is something that changed since our reviews, or
>>>>> whether I missed it in my review,
>>>>> but prov:Start and prov:End should be EntityInvolvement and not
>>>>> AgentInvolvement.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Luc
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 04/02/2012 09:12 PM, Timothy Lebo wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Luc, Paul, Simon, Sam, and MacTed,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Over the past couple telecons, you have accepted to review and provide
>>>>>> feedback for the PROV-O documents.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Please see ISSUE-336 for the information about reviewing PROV-O HTML and
>>>>>> OWL.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/336
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> If you could reply to this message when providing feedback, we would
>>>>>> greatly appreciate it.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> <Tim Lebo>
>>>>>>      prov:actedOnBehalfOf<PROV-O team>;
>>>>>> .
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> Professor Luc Moreau
>>>>> Electronics and Computer Science   tel:   +44 23 8059 4487
>>>>> University of Southampton          fax:   +44 23 8059 2865
>>>>> Southampton SO17 1BJ               email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk
>>>>> United Kingdom                     http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> Stian Soiland-Reyes, myGrid team
>>>> School of Computer Science
>>>> The University of Manchester
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Professor Luc Moreau
>> Electronics and Computer Science   tel:   +44 23 8059 4487
>> University of Southampton          fax:   +44 23 8059 2865
>> Southampton SO17 1BJ               email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk
>> United Kingdom                     http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 

Received on Friday, 20 April 2012 14:57:53 UTC