W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > April 2012

ACTION-70

From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 16:21:12 +0100
Message-ID: <EMEW3|8442fcd58ffb83fe17a10788cdcb2ebco3FGLE08L.Moreau|ecs.soton.ac.uk|4F8C38E8.503@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
To: Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>

Hi prov-o team,

ISSUE-84, ISSUE-262, and ISSUE-263 can be closed. They are addressed by 
the current document.

Regarding ISSUE-268, irrespective of the two-level ontology suggested 
originally, it would be
good to decide whether there will be an attempt to define constraints 
(such as in prov-dm-constraints) in
a separate ontology (or even the current one, if it's feasible) or in 
some form of rule language, or other.

Cheers,
Luc

-- 
Professor Luc Moreau
Electronics and Computer Science   tel:   +44 23 8059 4487
University of Southampton          fax:   +44 23 8059 2865
Southampton SO17 1BJ               email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk
United Kingdom                     http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
Received on Monday, 16 April 2012 15:21:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:07:03 GMT