W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > April 2012

Re: ACTION-70

From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 13:27:28 -0400
Cc: Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <67D22A0F-3C5B-43E8-B609-42ED5ED921E9@rpi.edu>
To: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Thanks, Luc.

We'll leave 268 open as we consider this option.

Regards,
Tim

On Apr 16, 2012, at 11:21 AM, Luc Moreau wrote:

> 
> Hi prov-o team,
> 
> ISSUE-84, ISSUE-262, and ISSUE-263 can be closed. They are addressed by the current document.
> 
> Regarding ISSUE-268, irrespective of the two-level ontology suggested originally, it would be
> good to decide whether there will be an attempt to define constraints (such as in prov-dm-constraints) in
> a separate ontology (or even the current one, if it's feasible) or in some form of rule language, or other.
> 
> Cheers,
> Luc
> 
> -- 
> Professor Luc Moreau
> Electronics and Computer Science   tel:   +44 23 8059 4487
> University of Southampton          fax:   +44 23 8059 2865
> Southampton SO17 1BJ               email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk
> United Kingdom                     http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
> 
> 
> 
Received on Monday, 16 April 2012 17:28:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:07:03 GMT