W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > April 2012

Re: [provo-html] PROV-ISSUE-119 (vanilla-rdf): How does vanilla RDF work with PROV Ontology [Formal Model]

From: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 16:14:04 +0100
Message-ID: <CAJCyKRpdutrRZSfKFFWnAD2g4T2NxyG7VAh5ZT62iVqye++ojA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
Cc: Khalid Belhajjame <Khalid.Belhajjame@cs.man.ac.uk>, Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
Hi Tim,

I went ahead and closed this issue. I still think there needs to be
sparqling done to see how "nice" the ontology is but I'll try it out
and raise this as a separate issue if it comes up.

cheers
Paul

On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu> wrote:
> Paul,
>
> I agree with Khalid that the new OWL-RL focus has eliminated the need to address any "PROV-O and Vanilla RDF" discussions, since they are one in the same.
>
> Can you provide specific concerns that remain in this particular ssue?
>
> Or please consider closing this and opening a new issue related to your "PROV-O should be easy to SPARQL" point that you've recently raised.
>
> Thanks,
> Tim
>
>
> On Mar 13, 2012, at 4:06 AM, Paul Groth wrote:
>
>> Hi Khalid,
>>
>> I would prefer to leave this issue open as a check when the next version of the ontology comes out. This is not just about owl-rl but how the whole thing looks in things like sparql.
>>
>> I'm sure it will be resolved but I want it as a reminder to check.
>>
>> cheers
>> Paul
>>
>> Khalid Belhajjame wrote:
>>> Hi Paul,
>>>
>>> Given that we decided to adopt OWL-RL, which is a (subset) profile of
>>> OWL. Would you be happy if we close this issue?
>>>
>>> Thanks, khalid
>>>
>>> On 06/10/2011 10:11, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
>>>> PROV-ISSUE-119 (vanilla-rdf): How does vanilla RDF work with PROV Ontology [Formal Model]
>>>>
>>>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/119
>>>>
>>>> Raised by: Paul Groth
>>>> On product: Formal Model
>>>>
>>>> The Provenance Ontology uses OWL for a number of reasons. However, we agreed at the last F2F that it was a good idea for adoption that that OWL be easy to use in "vanilla RDF" or developer friendly RDF.
>>>>
>>>> I was wondering if we could either add a section or another document that shows how some examples look in such vanilla rdf. Essentially, what can I do if I don't know anything about reasoning or even class hierarchies.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Dr. Paul Groth (p.t.groth@vu.nl)
>> http://www.few.vu.nl/~pgroth/
>> Assistant Professor
>> Knowledge Representation & Reasoning Group
>> Artificial Intelligence Section
>> Department of Computer Science
>> VU University Amsterdam
>>
>>
>>
>



-- 
--
Dr. Paul Groth (p.t.groth@vu.nl)
http://www.few.vu.nl/~pgroth/
Assistant Professor
Knowledge Representation & Reasoning Group
Artificial Intelligence Section
Department of Computer Science
VU University Amsterdam
Received on Monday, 16 April 2012 15:19:15 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:07:03 GMT