Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually "IVP of" each other [Conceptual Model] from Luc Moreau on 2012-04-02 (public-prov-wg@w3.org from April 2012)

From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2012 05:36:10 +0000
To: Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
CC: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>, James Cheney <jcheney@inf.ed.ac.uk>, "public-prov-wg@w3.org" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <EMEW3|84cf3fd1a011ddc60e08587a056d02b5o316aY08L.Moreau|ecs.soton.ac.uk|60C82253>

is this example really reflecting specialisation? The signature is contained in the email message. Is it a specialisation of it?

On 2 Apr 2012, at 00:11, "Stian Soiland-Reyes" <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk> wrote:

> My signature in the end of this email is a specialization of this
> email message, which is a specialization of my thoughts on this email
> thread. However the signature is not a specialization of those
> thoughts.

Received on Monday, 2 April 2012 05:37:11 UTC