On Apr 2, 2012, at 1:36 AM, Luc Moreau wrote: > > is this example really reflecting specialisation? The signature is contained in the email message. Is it a specialisation of it? No, it's not a specialization. If anything, the signature would be a quote. Where specialization _does_ come into play with Stian's email: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CAPRnXtk07xhLG=vh0jN_=0hYzs=_HGv+yrfVZ6S_2ShntxmQ4A@mail.gmail.com> a :Email; foaf:page <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-prov-wg/2012Apr/0006.html>; prov:wasAttributedTo :Stian; . :myCopyFromPOP prov:hadLocation <file:///MacintoshHD/Library/Mail.app/archives/0000009.eml>; prov:hadLocation <http://dbpedia.org/resource/United_States>; prov:specializationOf <http://www.w3.org/mid/CAPRnXtk07xhLG=vh0jN_=0hYzs=_HGv+yrfVZ6S_2ShntxmQ4A@mail.gmail.com>; prov:alternateOf :yourCopyFromPOP; . :yourCopyFromPOP prov:hadLocation <file:///Computer/Applications/Endora/archives/000000000000002.eml>; prov:hadLocation <http://dbpedia.org/resource/University_of_Southampton>; prov:specializationOf <http://www.w3.org/mid/CAPRnXtk07xhLG=vh0jN_=0hYzs=_HGv+yrfVZ6S_2ShntxmQ4A@mail.gmail.com>; . -Tim > > On 2 Apr 2012, at 00:11, "Stian Soiland-Reyes" <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk> wrote: > >> My signature in the end of this email is a specialization of this >> email message, which is a specialization of my thoughts on this email >> thread. However the signature is not a specialization of those >> thoughts. > >Received on Monday, 2 April 2012 12:32:26 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:07:02 GMT