Re: Qualified Involvements proposal

Hi Tim,

Does it mean we can introduce identifiers to Usage/Generation/etc ... ?
It would help simplify some aspects of the data model.

Also, could you confirm the names of all the new classes you have defined.
For instance, should we change 'Use Record' into 'Usage Record' in prov-dm?

Thanks,
Luc



On 06/11/11 21:20, Timothy Lebo wrote:
> prov-wg,
>
> The following link reflects the OWL group's discussions from the past week about replacing EntityInRole with qualified involvements.
>
> Please have a read.
>
> If you'd like to join our Monday noon US ET (we switched our clocks today) skype discussions, please let me and Satya know.
>
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/Qualifed_Involvements_in_PROV-O
>
> Regards,
> Tim Lebo
>    

Received on Monday, 7 November 2011 21:24:57 UTC