- From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 11:26:19 -0500
- To: Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
On Nov 7, 2011, at 4:23 PM, Luc Moreau wrote: > Hi Tim, > > Does it mean we can introduce identifiers to Usage/Generation/etc ... ? Absolutely. > It would help simplify some aspects of the data model. Great! > > Also, could you confirm the names of all the new classes you have defined. Usage, Participation, Control, and Generation are subclasses of QualifiedInvolvement . > For instance, should we change 'Use Record' into 'Usage Record' in prov-dm? I think this would help. -Tim > > Thanks, > Luc > > > > On 06/11/11 21:20, Timothy Lebo wrote: >> prov-wg, >> >> The following link reflects the OWL group's discussions from the past week about replacing EntityInRole with qualified involvements. >> >> Please have a read. >> >> If you'd like to join our Monday noon US ET (we switched our clocks today) skype discussions, please let me and Satya know. >> >> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/Qualifed_Involvements_in_PROV-O >> >> Regards, >> Tim Lebo >> > >
Received on Wednesday, 16 November 2011 16:26:57 UTC