- From: Iker Huerga <ihuerga@linkatu.net>
- Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 15:51:25 +0200
- To: Paul Groth <pgroth@gmail.com>
- CC: public-prov-wg@w3.org
Great. Regards On 05/10/2011 03:03 PM, Paul Groth wrote: > Hi Iker, > > I updated the example to add the processing step as you originally > suggested. > > Thanks, > Paul > > Iker Huerga wrote: >> Hi Paul, >> >> I thought that where it says "The government portal not only makes the >> data available but also publishes how the data was generated" not only >> tools to make the conversion but also provenance information were >> published. >> >> In case only the newspaper publishes provenance information it would >> simplify the example. Probably an easier starting point. >> >> Best Regards >> >> >> On 05/10/2011 01:13 PM, Paul Groth wrote: >>> Hi Iker, >>> >>> In the example, we say that "To be transparent, the newspaper >>> publishes a document describing the provenance of the chart including >>> where it got the data from but also what tools and assumptions it used >>> to create the chart." >>> >>> So it's the newspaper not the government that's publishing provenance. >>> Does that cover what you want? >>> >>> cheers, >>> Paul >>> >>> Iker Huerga wrote: >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> From my point of view the data journalism example perfectly >>>> illustrates >>>> the provenance concepts. >>>> >>>> I just would like to make a couple of questions regarding the example. >>>> >>>> 1. As stated in the charter "Provenance Interchange Working Group has >>>> the following objective: [...] and define methods to publish and >>>> access provenance". So, should we add a second processing steps as >>>> follows: "government (gov) generates provenance information (prov) >>>> regarding RDF (f1)" or is it already assumed? >>>> 2. And in that case, Provenance information generation process will >>>> be carried out during the conversion process or in a different one? >>>> >>>> Best Regards >>>> >>>> Iker >>>> >>>> On 05/10/2011 11:30 AM, Paul Groth wrote: >>>>> Hi All: >>>>> >>>>> I asked for feedback on the proposed data journalism example [1] by >>>>> Monday. There was not a lot of discussion so I hope it's safe to >>>>> assume that the example was considered to be a good start. >>>>> >>>>> To help the discussion get going, I've put up a page [2] that lists >>>>> each concept from the charter and illustration of it from the >>>>> example. >>>>> >>>>> It would be good to see if we agree whether these illustrations >>>>> actually illustrate the concepts. >>>>> >>>>> regards, >>>>> Paul >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ProvenanceExample >>>>> [2] http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/CharterConceptsIllustration >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Iker Huerga Sánchez >>>> Co-Founder, LINKatu >>>> Polo de Innovación Garaia >>>> Goiru, 1. Edificio A, 4º Piso >>>> 20500 Arrasate - Gipuzkoa >>>> T+34 943 712 072 F+34 943 712 223 >>>> ihuerga@linkatu.net >>>> http://www.linkatu.net >>>> >> >> >> -- >> Iker Huerga Sánchez >> Co-Founder, LINKatu >> Polo de Innovación Garaia >> Goiru, 1. Edificio A, 4º Piso >> 20500 Arrasate - Gipuzkoa >> T+34 943 712 072 F+34 943 712 223 >> ihuerga@linkatu.net >> http://www.linkatu.net >> -- Iker Huerga Sánchez Co-Founder, LINKatu Polo de Innovación Garaia Goiru, 1. Edificio A, 4º Piso 20500 Arrasate - Gipuzkoa T+34 943 712 072 F+34 943 712 223 ihuerga@linkatu.net http://www.linkatu.net
Received on Tuesday, 10 May 2011 13:51:54 UTC