- From: Paul Groth <pgroth@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 14:03:21 +0100
- To: Iker Huerga <ihuerga@linkatu.net>
- CC: public-prov-wg@w3.org
Hi Iker, I updated the example to add the processing step as you originally suggested. Thanks, Paul Iker Huerga wrote: > Hi Paul, > > I thought that where it says "The government portal not only makes the > data available but also publishes how the data was generated" not only > tools to make the conversion but also provenance information were > published. > > In case only the newspaper publishes provenance information it would > simplify the example. Probably an easier starting point. > > Best Regards > > > On 05/10/2011 01:13 PM, Paul Groth wrote: >> Hi Iker, >> >> In the example, we say that "To be transparent, the newspaper >> publishes a document describing the provenance of the chart including >> where it got the data from but also what tools and assumptions it used >> to create the chart." >> >> So it's the newspaper not the government that's publishing provenance. >> Does that cover what you want? >> >> cheers, >> Paul >> >> Iker Huerga wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> From my point of view the data journalism example perfectly illustrates >>> the provenance concepts. >>> >>> I just would like to make a couple of questions regarding the example. >>> >>> 1. As stated in the charter "Provenance Interchange Working Group has >>> the following objective: [...] and define methods to publish and >>> access provenance". So, should we add a second processing steps as >>> follows: "government (gov) generates provenance information (prov) >>> regarding RDF (f1)" or is it already assumed? >>> 2. And in that case, Provenance information generation process will >>> be carried out during the conversion process or in a different one? >>> >>> Best Regards >>> >>> Iker >>> >>> On 05/10/2011 11:30 AM, Paul Groth wrote: >>>> Hi All: >>>> >>>> I asked for feedback on the proposed data journalism example [1] by >>>> Monday. There was not a lot of discussion so I hope it's safe to >>>> assume that the example was considered to be a good start. >>>> >>>> To help the discussion get going, I've put up a page [2] that lists >>>> each concept from the charter and illustration of it from the example. >>>> >>>> It would be good to see if we agree whether these illustrations >>>> actually illustrate the concepts. >>>> >>>> regards, >>>> Paul >>>> >>>> >>>> [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ProvenanceExample >>>> [2] http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/CharterConceptsIllustration >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Iker Huerga Sánchez >>> Co-Founder, LINKatu >>> Polo de Innovación Garaia >>> Goiru, 1. Edificio A, 4º Piso >>> 20500 Arrasate - Gipuzkoa >>> T+34 943 712 072 F+34 943 712 223 >>> ihuerga@linkatu.net >>> http://www.linkatu.net >>> > > > -- > Iker Huerga Sánchez > Co-Founder, LINKatu > Polo de Innovación Garaia > Goiru, 1. Edificio A, 4º Piso > 20500 Arrasate - Gipuzkoa > T+34 943 712 072 F+34 943 712 223 > ihuerga@linkatu.net > http://www.linkatu.net >
Received on Tuesday, 10 May 2011 13:03:55 UTC