Hi Luc, Will the definitions on this page be distinct from those on http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ConceptProcessExecution? Thanks. Best, Satya On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 12:42 PM, Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>wrote: > A page to list terms: > > http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/TerminologyProposals > > Professor Luc Moreau > Electronics and Computer Science > University of Southampton > Southampton SO17 1BJ > United Kingdom > > On 9 Jun 2011, at 17:37, "Paul Groth" <pgroth@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi Graham, > > > > I had proposed the term "snapshot" for IVPT on another thread. > > > > I don't know what you/others thing of that. > > > > cheers, > > Paul > > > > Daniel Garijo wrote: > >> I totally agree with you. > >> Best, > >> Daniel > >> > >> 2011/6/9 Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org <mailto:GK@ninebynine.org>> > >> > >> While I live with the term IVPT as a way to allow us to move our > >> discussions forward, I think it would be horrible if it actually > >> ended up in any of the documents we produce. > >> > >> I'm not asking for any change now, just giving notice that I > >> expect us to settle on a better term when we can see better what > >> we're talking about and what we actually need to say. > >> > >> #g > >> -- > >> > >> Jun Zhao wrote: > >> > >> Dear all, > >> > >> To bootstrap the development of the model task force, Satya, > >> Paolo, Khalid and I put together a document [1] highlighting > >> issues and goals to focus on during the F2F1. > >> > >> The document is not meant to be definitive. It should be > >> updated and evolved as discussions raised in the mailing list. > >> We hope this document could help with setting expectation for > >> the F2F1 and guidance on the near focus of the WG. > >> > >> [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/F2F1_Model_Proposal > >> > >> Best regards, > >> > >> Jun > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > >
Received on Thursday, 9 June 2011 16:55:31 UTC