Re: IVPT (invariant view or perspective on thing)

A page to list terms:

http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/TerminologyProposals

Professor Luc Moreau
Electronics and Computer Science
University of Southampton 
Southampton SO17 1BJ
United Kingdom

On 9 Jun 2011, at 17:37, "Paul Groth" <pgroth@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Graham,
> 
> I had proposed the term "snapshot" for IVPT on another thread.
> 
> I don't know what you/others thing of that.
> 
> cheers,
> Paul
> 
> Daniel Garijo wrote:
>> I totally agree with you.
>> Best,
>> Daniel
>> 
>> 2011/6/9 Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org <mailto:GK@ninebynine.org>>
>> 
>>    While I live with the term IVPT as a way to allow us to move our
>>    discussions forward, I think it would be horrible if it actually
>>    ended up in any of the documents we produce.
>> 
>>    I'm not asking for any change now, just giving notice that I
>>    expect us to settle on a better term when we can see better what
>>    we're talking about and what we actually need to say.
>> 
>>    #g
>>    --
>> 
>>    Jun Zhao wrote:
>> 
>>        Dear all,
>> 
>>        To bootstrap the development of the model task force, Satya,
>>        Paolo, Khalid and I put together a document [1] highlighting
>>        issues and goals to focus on during the F2F1.
>> 
>>        The document is not meant to be definitive. It should be
>>        updated and evolved as discussions raised in the mailing list.
>>        We hope this document could help with setting expectation for
>>        the F2F1 and guidance on the near focus of the WG.
>> 
>>        [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/F2F1_Model_Proposal
>> 
>>        Best regards,
>> 
>>        Jun
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 

Received on Thursday, 9 June 2011 16:44:36 UTC