W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > June 2011

Re: IVPT (invariant view or perspective on thing)

From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 16:59:08 +0000
To: Satya Sahoo <satya.sahoo@case.edu>
CC: Paul Groth <pgroth@gmail.com>, Daniel Garijo <dgarijo@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es>, Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>, "public-prov-wg@w3.org" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <EMEW3|3781053126bda96bcd4195d1e2913e3cn58HxD08L.Moreau|ecs.soton.ac.uk|F9449D8F-4992-42A3-A0E7-F920F9872FF6@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Hi satya,

It's just meant to be a single place for all terms we propose for concepts, not their definition.

Professor Luc Moreau
Electronics and Computer Science
University of Southampton
Southampton SO17 1BJ
United Kingdom

On 9 Jun 2011, at 17:56, "Satya Sahoo" <satya.sahoo@case.edu<mailto:satya.sahoo@case.edu>> wrote:

Hi Luc,
Will the definitions on this page be distinct from those on <http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ConceptProcessExecution> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ConceptProcessExecution?

Thanks.

Best,
Satya

On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 12:42 PM, Luc Moreau <<mailto:L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk<mailto:L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>> wrote:
A page to list terms:

<http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/TerminologyProposals>http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/TerminologyProposals

Professor Luc Moreau
Electronics and Computer Science
University of Southampton
Southampton SO17 1BJ
United Kingdom

On 9 Jun 2011, at 17:37, "Paul Groth" <<mailto:pgroth@gmail.com>pgroth@gmail.com<mailto:pgroth@gmail.com>> wrote:

> Hi Graham,
>
> I had proposed the term "snapshot" for IVPT on another thread.
>
> I don't know what you/others thing of that.
>
> cheers,
> Paul
>
> Daniel Garijo wrote:
>> I totally agree with you.
>> Best,
>> Daniel
>>
>> 2011/6/9 Graham Klyne <<mailto:GK@ninebynine.org>GK@ninebynine.org<mailto:GK@ninebynine.org> <mailto:<mailto:GK@ninebynine.org>GK@ninebynine.org<mailto:GK@ninebynine.org>>>
>>
>>    While I live with the term IVPT as a way to allow us to move our
>>    discussions forward, I think it would be horrible if it actually
>>    ended up in any of the documents we produce.
>>
>>    I'm not asking for any change now, just giving notice that I
>>    expect us to settle on a better term when we can see better what
>>    we're talking about and what we actually need to say.
>>
>>    #g
>>    --
>>
>>    Jun Zhao wrote:
>>
>>        Dear all,
>>
>>        To bootstrap the development of the model task force, Satya,
>>        Paolo, Khalid and I put together a document [1] highlighting
>>        issues and goals to focus on during the F2F1.
>>
>>        The document is not meant to be definitive. It should be
>>        updated and evolved as discussions raised in the mailing list.
>>        We hope this document could help with setting expectation for
>>        the F2F1 and guidance on the near focus of the WG.
>>
>>        [1] <http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/F2F1_Model_Proposal> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/F2F1_Model_Proposal
>>
>>        Best regards,
>>
>>        Jun
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
Received on Thursday, 9 June 2011 17:00:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:06:31 GMT