W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > June 2011

Re: IVPT (invariant view or perspective on thing)

From: Paul Groth <pgroth@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2011 18:32:38 +0200
Message-ID: <4DF0F5A6.6030906@gmail.com>
To: Daniel Garijo <dgarijo@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es>
CC: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>, "public-prov-wg@w3.org" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Hi Graham,

I had proposed the term "snapshot" for IVPT on another thread.

I don't know what you/others thing of that.

cheers,
Paul

Daniel Garijo wrote:
> I totally agree with you.
> Best,
> Daniel
>
> 2011/6/9 Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org <mailto:GK@ninebynine.org>>
>
>     While I live with the term IVPT as a way to allow us to move our
>     discussions forward, I think it would be horrible if it actually
>     ended up in any of the documents we produce.
>
>     I'm not asking for any change now, just giving notice that I
>     expect us to settle on a better term when we can see better what
>     we're talking about and what we actually need to say.
>
>     #g
>     --
>
>     Jun Zhao wrote:
>
>         Dear all,
>
>         To bootstrap the development of the model task force, Satya,
>         Paolo, Khalid and I put together a document [1] highlighting
>         issues and goals to focus on during the F2F1.
>
>         The document is not meant to be definitive. It should be
>         updated and evolved as discussions raised in the mailing list.
>         We hope this document could help with setting expectation for
>         the F2F1 and guidance on the near focus of the WG.
>
>         [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/F2F1_Model_Proposal
>
>         Best regards,
>
>         Jun
>
>
>
>
Received on Thursday, 9 June 2011 16:35:13 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:06:31 GMT