Re: Call for Consensus to Publish Payment Method Manifest as a First Public Working Draft - RESPONSE REQUESTED

Ripple supports the proposal

On 28 November 2017 at 13:54, 刘大鹏(鹏成) <max.ldp@alibaba-inc.com> wrote:

> Alibaba supports the proposal.
>
> Thanks,
> Max
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> From:Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
> Send Time:2017年11月28日(星期二) 01:22
> To:Payments WG <public-payments-wg@w3.org>
> Subject:Call for Consensus to Publish Payment Method Manifest as a First
> Public Working Draft - RESPONSE REQUESTED
>
> Dear Web Payments Working Group Participants,
>
> At the TPAC face-to-face meeting there we discussed [1] issuing a
> Call for Consensus (CfC) to publish Payment Method Manifest as a
> First Public Working Draft.
>
> This is a Call for Consensus to publish:
>
>  Payment Method Manifest
>  https://w3c.github.io/payment-method-manifest/
>
>  Source
>  https://github.com/w3c/payment-method-manifest/commit/
> 471fe365d6660a5499cda7c1ba83e19984a1d085
>
> We would like to thank the editors for preparing this
> document. Note: we will adjust the publication
> date; 22 December is just a placeholder.
>
> PLEASE RESPOND to the proposal by 6 December 2017 (10am ET).
>
> For the co-Chairs,
> Ian Jacobs
>
> [1] https://www.w3.org/2017/11/07-wpwg-minutes.html#item01
>
> =========
> PROPOSAL
>
> That the Web Payments Working Group request that the W3C
> Director approve the
> above specification as a First Public Working Draft on
> the Recommendation Track.
>
> Please indicate one of the following in your response:
>
>  1. Support the proposal.
>
>  2. Request some changes, but support the proposal even
>      if suggested changes are not taken into account.
>
>  3. Request some changes, and do not support the proposal
>      unless the changes are taken into account.
>
>  4. Do not support the proposal (please provide rationale).
>
>  5. Support the consensus of the Web Payments Working Group.
>
>  6. Abstain.
>
> We invite you to include rationale in your response.
>
> If there is strong consensus by 6 December 2017 (10am ET)
> for the proposal, it will carry.
>
> ====================
> REMINDERS ABOUT NOTES, CONSENSUS, AND FORMAL OBJECTIONS
>
> * Publication as a First Public Working Draft does NOT
> indicate that a document
>   is complete or represents Working Group consensus.
>
> * In case of a decision to publish, the Chairs will
> request approval from the W3C
>   Director to publish a First Public Working Draft. In this
> case, if you wish your LACK
>   of support to publish to be conveyed to the Director and
> reviewed, please include
>   the phrase "FORMAL OBJECTION" [2] in your response and be sure to
> include
>   substantive arguments or rationale.
>
> * Silence will be taken to mean there is no Formal Objection [2].
>
> * The W3C Director takes Formal Objections seriously, and therefore
>   they typically require significant time and effort to
>   address. Therefore, please limit any Formal Objections to issues
>   related to the scope of these documents rather than technical
>   content where the Working Group has not yet made a decision.
>
> * If there are Formal Objections, the Chairs plan to contact the
>   individual(s) who made them to see whether there are changes that
>   would address the concern and increase consensus to publish.
>
> [2] https://www.w3.org/2017/Process-20170301/#Consensus
>
> --
> Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
> https://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs/
> Tel: +1 718 260 9447 <(718)%20260-9447>
>
>
>
>
>