Re: Call for Consensus to Publish Payment Method Manifest as a First Public Working Draft - RESPONSE REQUESTED

Apple Supports


Magda

> On Nov 27, 2017, at 9:20 AM, Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> wrote:
> 
> Dear Web Payments Working Group Participants,
> 
> At the TPAC face-to-face meeting there we discussed [1] issuing a 
> Call for Consensus (CfC) to publish Payment Method Manifest as a 
> First Public Working Draft. 
> 
> This is a Call for Consensus to publish:
> 
> Payment Method Manifest
> https://w3c.github.io/payment-method-manifest/
> 
> Source
> https://github.com/w3c/payment-method-manifest/commit/471fe365d6660a5499cda7c1ba83e19984a1d085
> 
> We would like to thank the editors for preparing this document. Note: we will adjust the publication
> date; 22 December is just a placeholder.
> 
> PLEASE RESPOND to the proposal by 6 December 2017 (10am ET).
> 
> For the co-Chairs,
> Ian Jacobs
> 
> [1] https://www.w3.org/2017/11/07-wpwg-minutes.html#item01
> 
> =========
> PROPOSAL
> 
> That the Web Payments Working Group request that the W3C Director approve the 
> above specification as a First Public Working Draft on the Recommendation Track.
> 
> Please indicate one of the following in your response:
> 
> 1. Support the proposal.
> 
> 2. Request some changes, but support the proposal even
>     if suggested changes are not taken into account.
> 
> 3. Request some changes, and do not support the proposal
>     unless the changes are taken into account.
> 
> 4. Do not support the proposal (please provide rationale).
> 
> 5. Support the consensus of the Web Payments Working Group.
> 
> 6. Abstain.
> 
> We invite you to include rationale in your response.
> 
> If there is strong consensus by 6 December 2017 (10am ET) for the proposal, it will carry.
> 
> ====================
> REMINDERS ABOUT NOTES, CONSENSUS, AND FORMAL OBJECTIONS
> 
> * Publication as a First Public Working Draft does NOT indicate that a document
>  is complete or represents Working Group consensus.
> 
> * In case of a decision to publish, the Chairs will request approval from the W3C
>  Director to publish a First Public Working Draft. In this case, if you wish your LACK
>  of support to publish to be conveyed to the Director and reviewed, please include 
>  the phrase "FORMAL OBJECTION" [2] in your response and be sure to include
>  substantive arguments or rationale.
> 
> * Silence will be taken to mean there is no Formal Objection [2].
> 
> * The W3C Director takes Formal Objections seriously, and therefore
>  they typically require significant time and effort to
>  address. Therefore, please limit any Formal Objections to issues
>  related to the scope of these documents rather than technical
>  content where the Working Group has not yet made a decision.
> 
> * If there are Formal Objections, the Chairs plan to contact the
>  individual(s) who made them to see whether there are changes that 
>  would address the concern and increase consensus to publish.
> 
> [2] https://www.w3.org/2017/Process-20170301/#Consensus
> 
> --
> Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
> https://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs/
> Tel: +1 718 260 9447
> 
> 
> 
> 
>

Received on Tuesday, 28 November 2017 21:41:43 UTC