- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 17:20:07 -0400 (EDT)
- To: public-owl-wg@w3.org
Review of "Document Overview"
General:
Very close to being suitable for LC.
Abstract:
I don't see any need for the "part 1 of <very large number>" section of
the abstract.
1/ Introductio:n
Add:
"This document provides a high-level overview of OWL 2 and serves as a
roadmap for the documents that define and describe OWL 2."
2/ Overview:
Could remove the subsection headers, as the subsections are all very
short.
Change "Note that many users ... could ..." to "Most users ... would
...".
Figure 1: RDF-Based Semantics
Remove EdNote on GRDDL.
2.2/ Syntaxes:
Remove "It must be emphasized, ...." as it just repeats stuff from the
previous paragraph.
The table just repeats stuff from Figure 1 - remove it.
2.3/ Semantics:
Add to end of third paragraph:
''OWL 2 Full'' is used informally to refer to RDF graphs considered as OWL
2 ontologies and interpreted using the RDF-based semantics.
Maybe add (although I don't think that it is necessary):
''OWL 2 DL'' is used informally to refer to OWL 2 DL ontologies
interpreted using the direct semantics.
2.4/ Profiles:
Remove Figure 2, as it serves no useful purpose.
3/ Differences
Could remove the subsection headers, as the subsections are all very
short.
Change "albeit under a possibly different name." to
"albeit possibly under different names."
Remove "; it also has a formal equivalence to UML [UML]."
This is just *wrong*.
3.2:
Just put this stuff elsewhere (perhaps in Primer).
4/ Roadmap
All names of documents should link to the document.
Remove the editor's note, as we expect everything to be a WD this time.
Document Overview.
A guide to the OWL 2 documents and a high-level overview of OWL 2.
Replace the Note: with "(WG Note)" in the two appropriate lines.
Received on Monday, 30 March 2009 21:18:29 UTC