My review comments on the QRG guide will require quite extensive changes for it to be suitable for LC status. I worry about the changes being made in time for a re-review in time for publication on 15 April. On the other hand, I don't see any problem with publishing the QRG in an interim form on 15 April, nor do I see any particular problem in the QRG going to LC status a bit later, and then catching up with the core documents, particularly as QRG will not need a CR phase. peterReceived on Monday, 30 March 2009 21:04:27 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 30 March 2009 21:04:30 GMT