Re: Responses to LC comments DA1 and SR1

+1 to both responses.

Re DA1: I also have deliberately not used the Turtle "a" in the Primer. It 
might be a convenient shorthand if rdf:type is essentially the only special 
vocabulary element in a document. But it is hardly useful to have one such 
abbreviation if there are so many other rdf, rdfs, and owl language elements 
that are just as frequent and relevant. Using "a" also slightly blurs the 
relationship to the RDF/XML serialisation. These were my main considerations, 
but it is good that the drafted reply even avoids this discussion.

-- Markus


On Montag, 22. Juni 2009, Ian Horrocks wrote:
> Peter has written responses, basically declining to accept either
> suggestion [1,2]. Let me know if you have any comments/objections. If
> I don't hear anything by the end of the week I will ask Peter to send
> off these responses.
>
> Regards,
> Ian
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/LC3_Responses/DA1
> [2] http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/LC3_Responses/SR1


-- 
Markus Krötzsch
Institute AIFB, Universität Karlsruhe (TH), 76128 Karlsruhe
phone +49 (0)721 608 7362           fax +49 (0)721 608 5998
mak@aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de           www  http://korrekt.org
http://semantic-web-book.org  http://semantic-mediawiki.org