Re: Responses to LC comments DA1 and SR1

+1

> Re DA1: I also have deliberately not used the Turtle "a" in the Primer. It 
> might be a convenient shorthand if rdf:type is essentially the only special 
> vocabulary element in a document. But it is hardly useful to have one such 
> abbreviation if there are so many other rdf, rdfs, and owl language elements 
> that are just as frequent and relevant. Using "a" also slightly blurs the 
> relationship to the RDF/XML serialisation. These were my main considerations, 
> but it is good that the drafted reply even avoids this discussion.
> 
> -- Markus
> 
> 
> On Montag, 22. Juni 2009, Ian Horrocks wrote:
>> Peter has written responses, basically declining to accept either
>> suggestion [1,2]. Let me know if you have any comments/objections. If
>> I don't hear anything by the end of the week I will ask Peter to send
>> off these responses.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Ian
>>
>> [1] http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/LC3_Responses/DA1
>> [2] http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/LC3_Responses/SR1
> 
> 

-- 
PD Dr. Pascal Hitzler
pascal@pascal-hitzler.de   http://www.pascal-hitzler.de
Semantic Web Textbook: http://www.semantic-web-book.org