On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 14:20, Alan Ruttenberg<alanruttenberg@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Ian > Horrocks<ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk> wrote: >> At least HermiT and Pellet are able to operate completely independently -- >> they can take an OWL 2 ontology in RDF/XML format and check if it is >> satisfiable. The use of Mike's test harness is merely a convenience. > > What are they using for parsers? Given the setup with P4 as example, > my expectation would have been that they both use the OWLAPI to the > parsing. Pellet supports parsing OWL 2 RDF/XML from either its OWLAPI or Jena interfaces. -- Mike Smith Clark & ParsiaReceived on Wednesday, 29 July 2009 19:10:42 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 29 July 2009 19:10:42 GMT