W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > July 2009

Re: need a list of systems parsing OWL2 RDF/XML

From: Mike Smith <msmith@clarkparsia.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 15:10:01 -0400
Message-ID: <42485a40907291210i17e449b3jae5394581e172bd1@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
Cc: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>, public-owl-wg@w3.org
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 14:20, Alan Ruttenberg<alanruttenberg@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Ian
> Horrocks<ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk> wrote:
>> At least HermiT and Pellet are able to operate completely independently --
>> they can take an OWL 2 ontology in RDF/XML format and check if it is
>> satisfiable. The use of Mike's test harness is merely a convenience.
>
> What are they using for parsers? Given the setup with P4 as example,
> my expectation would have been that they both use the OWLAPI to the
> parsing.

Pellet supports parsing OWL 2 RDF/XML from either its OWLAPI or Jena interfaces.

-- 
Mike Smith

Clark & Parsia
Received on Wednesday, 29 July 2009 19:10:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 29 July 2009 19:10:42 GMT