W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > July 2009

Re: need a list of systems parsing OWL2 RDF/XML

From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 14:20:59 -0400
Message-ID: <29af5e2d0907291120g7279b2fexe9c44ef843678442@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
Cc: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>, public-owl-wg@w3.org
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Ian
Horrocks<ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk> wrote:
> At least HermiT and Pellet are able to operate completely independently --
> they can take an OWL 2 ontology in RDF/XML format and check if it is
> satisfiable. The use of Mike's test harness is merely a convenience.

What are they using for parsers? Given the setup with P4 as example,
my expectation would have been that they both use the OWLAPI to the
parsing.

-Alan

>
> Ian
>
>
> On 29 Jul 2009, at 18:51, Sandro Hawke wrote:
>
>>> Looking at the test results, it appears that there are a number of
>>> systems that are passing test cases and thus must be doing parsing.
>>
>> Pointer?
>>
>> Last I heard (and of course I may have missed something), Mike Smith was
>> doing all the testing, using an OWLAPI to drive reasoners.  That setup
>> obviously does not address my concern.
>>
>>     -- Sandro
>>
>>> peter
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
>>> Subject: need a list of systems parsing OWL2 RDF/XML
>>> Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 10:54:04 -0500
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Are there any systems which parse all the the OWL2 test cases, and claim
>>>> to parse all OWL 2 ontologies (from the RDF/XML syntax)?  I expect
>>>> OWLAPI can do the parsing; I don't know if the existing "1.1" code is
>>>> complete, though, or when "version 3" will be out.  And even if it's
>>>> perfect, we still need another one....
>>>>
>>>> I asked this whimsically a few days ago, and I haven't heard any systems
>>>> named yet.  It is a serious question; I don't think we can exit CR if
>>>> all the passing systems use the same library for parsing (since it
>>>> doesn't show multiple implementations of the mapping-to-rdf spec).
>>>>
>>>>    -- Sandro
>>>>
>>
>
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 29 July 2009 18:22:00 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 29 July 2009 18:22:00 GMT