I looked at what has been done to SS&FS, M2RDF & R-BS, and I saw that it was good. I changed versionInfo to versionIRI in QRG -- I hope that this was good! Ian On 8 Apr 2009, at 19:47, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > From: "Boris Motik" <boris.motik@comlab.ox.ac.uk> > Subject: owl:versionInfo -> owl:versionIRI imlpemented [sic] > Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 19:20:13 +0100 > >> Hello, >> >> I've just implemented the owl:versionInfo -> owl:versionIRI >> change. Basically, >> owl:versionInfo is now a regular annotation property, and we use >> owl:versionIRI >> in the RDF mapping. Here are the diffs: >> >> Syntax: >> http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/index.php? >> title=Syntax&diff=21671&oldid=21595 > > With some wording fixes: > http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/index.php? > title=Syntax&diff=21676&oldid=21595 > >> RDF Mapping: >> http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/index.php? >> title=Mapping_to_RDF_Graphs&diff=21668 >> &oldid=21538 >> >> Regards, >> >> Boris > > > These changes to RDF Mapping are fine. > The updated changes for Syntax are fine. > > > The other documents that need changes are: > > QRG > - one occurrence of owl:versionInfo to be changed to owl:versionIRI > - add owl:versionInfo to the list of Annotation Properties with a > suitable description > > RDF-Based Semantics > - add owl:versionIRI to Table 3.2 > - add owl:versionIRI to Table 5.3 > > I'll leave my action open until these last two are done. > > > peter >Received on Thursday, 9 April 2009 13:27:08 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 9 April 2009 13:27:09 GMT