W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > September 2008

Re: revised (punchier) version of LC comment on XML Schema Datatypes

From: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2008 22:42:48 +0100
Message-Id: <4F683F76-4342-4210-839A-1B3D0862A230@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
Cc: sandro@w3.org, public-owl-wg@w3.org
To: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>

Thanks!

Ian


On 5 Sep 2008, at 13:56, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:

> From: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
> Subject: Re: revised (punchier) version of LC comment on XML Schema  
> Datatypes
> Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 17:13:13 +0100
>
>> On 3 Sep 2008, at 21:07, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
>>> Subject: Re: revised (punchier) version of LC comment on XML  
>>> Schema Datatypes
>>> Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2008 15:45:52 -0400
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> The revised draft letter is now available at
>>>>> http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/DateTime
>>>>>
>>>>> After concurrence by the OWL team I will send this to the XML  
>>>>> Schema WG.
>>>>
>>>> Good.   Two points:
>>>>
>>>>   1. I'd suggest dropping 1.4.  It seems to be based on thinking  
>>>> that
>>>>      the 840 is hours instead of minutes.
>>>
>>> The issue is 14 hours vs 12 hours.  I could either make that  
>>> explicit or
>>> drop the (admittedly minor) point.
>>
>> I tweaked this (by appending "i.e., -720 to +840" to the offending  
>> sentence). Feel free to change/delete this part -- it is, as you  
>> say, of minor importance.
>>
>> IMHO, it is now ready to go -- please send it to the XML Schema WG.
>>
>> Thanks for your efforts on this.
>>
>> Ian
>
> Sent to the XML Schema WG, as
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/ 
> 2008JulSep/0135.html
>
> peter
Received on Sunday, 7 September 2008 21:43:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:42:06 UTC