W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > September 2008

Re: revised (punchier) version of LC comment on XML Schema Datatypes

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2008 08:56:29 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <20080905.085629.260097588.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
To: ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk
Cc: sandro@w3.org, public-owl-wg@w3.org

From: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: revised (punchier) version of LC comment on XML Schema Datatypes 
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 17:13:13 +0100

> On 3 Sep 2008, at 21:07, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> 
> >
> > From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
> > Subject: Re: revised (punchier) version of LC comment on XML Schema Datatypes
> > Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2008 15:45:52 -0400
> >
> >>
> >>> The revised draft letter is now available at
> >>> http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/DateTime
> >>>
> >>> After concurrence by the OWL team I will send this to the XML Schema WG.
> >>
> >> Good.   Two points:
> >>
> >>   1. I'd suggest dropping 1.4.  It seems to be based on thinking that
> >>      the 840 is hours instead of minutes.
> >
> > The issue is 14 hours vs 12 hours.  I could either make that explicit or
> > drop the (admittedly minor) point.
> 
> I tweaked this (by appending "i.e., -720 to +840" to the offending sentence). Feel free to change/delete this part -- it is, as you say, of minor importance.
> 
> IMHO, it is now ready to go -- please send it to the XML Schema WG.
> 
> Thanks for your efforts on this.
> 
> Ian

Sent to the XML Schema WG, as
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2008JulSep/0135.html

peter
Received on Friday, 5 September 2008 12:57:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:42:06 UTC