W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > September 2008

Re: revised (punchier) version of LC comment on XML Schema Datatypes

From: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 17:13:13 +0100
Message-Id: <969DBD28-C274-48B9-9676-F7AC77C1B271@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
Cc: sandro@w3.org, public-owl-wg@w3.org
To: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>

On 3 Sep 2008, at 21:07, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:

>
> From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
> Subject: Re: revised (punchier) version of LC comment on XML Schema  
> Datatypes
> Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2008 15:45:52 -0400
>
>>
>>> The revised draft letter is now available at
>>> http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/DateTime
>>>
>>> After concurrence by the OWL team I will send this to the XML  
>>> Schema WG.
>>
>> Good.   Two points:
>>
>>   1. I'd suggest dropping 1.4.  It seems to be based on thinking that
>>      the 840 is hours instead of minutes.
>
> The issue is 14 hours vs 12 hours.  I could either make that  
> explicit or
> drop the (admittedly minor) point.

I tweaked this (by appending "i.e., -720 to +840" to the offending  
sentence). Feel free to change/delete this part -- it is, as you say,  
of minor importance.

IMHO, it is now ready to go -- please send it to the XML Schema WG.

Thanks for your efforts on this.

Ian




>
>>   2. "Otherwise the WG will not requiring minimal conformance that  
>> is"
>>                             ^be ?
>
> And why didn't *you* make this editorial correction?  :-)
>
>>       -- Sandro
>
> peter
>
Received on Thursday, 4 September 2008 16:13:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 4 September 2008 16:13:57 GMT