Re: document appendix for functional syntax MIME type

From: "Alan Ruttenberg" <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: document appendix for functional syntax MIME type
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 03:27:28 -0500

> On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 10:13 AM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider
> <pfps@research.bell-labs.com> wrote:
> >
> > Here is my initial draft of an appendix to Syntax that has the stuff
> > needed for the MIME type.  I think that the equivalent for the
> > Manchester Syntax would be very similar.
> >
> > peter
> 
> snip
> 
> > Applications which use this media type:
> >    No widely deployed applications are known to use this media type. It
> >    may be used by some web services and clients consuming their data.
> 
> Current doc says Protege 4 and Topbraid. I was surprised about
> Topbraid. Is this verified? I sent a note to Jeremy Carroll to
> confirm.

> > Author/Change controller:
> >    The OWL Functional Syntax is the product of the W3C OWL Working
> >    Group; W3C reserves change control over this specification.
> 
> Current document says:
> 
> "Author/Change controller
> The OWL functional-style Syntax is the product of the W3C OWL Working
> Group in cooperation with OWL ontology tool builders; the
> specification may be extended by groups of OWL tool builders; W3C
> reserves change control over this specification.
> "
> 
> I'm not sure what it means that the specification can be extended by
> someone but that change control is in the hands of the W3C.

> -Alan

Both of these are cut-and-paste errors caused by copying from the
section for the Manchester syntax.  I've reverted them (with minor
changes).

Thanks for catching this problem.

peter