On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 5:04 PM, Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk> wrote: > On 11 Nov 2008, at 21:30, Alan Ruttenberg wrote: > [snip] >> >> Possible discussion permitting some specific additional rdf vocabulary >> in OWL > > [snip] > > I don't recall anything like this appearing on the mailing list, so why is > it on the telecon agenda? Who's championing it? Is there a proposal? Apologies for the brevity. This is related to the discussion that ensued from http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/2008Oct/0147.html The interested parties (which include me) are discussing whether to post an issue or not. *If* they do I thought it important to discuss it. Therefore I left a place in the agenda. The last concrete proposal, some form of which may make it into an issue is http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/2008Nov/0048.html -AlanReceived on Tuesday, 11 November 2008 23:04:15 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 11 November 2008 23:04:17 GMT