W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > November 2008

Re: document appendix for functional syntax MIME type

From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 03:27:28 -0500
Message-ID: <29af5e2d0811110027g1ff070f9xfff54488b5b99bb6@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Cc: public-owl-wg@w3.org

On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 10:13 AM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider
<pfps@research.bell-labs.com> wrote:
>
> Here is my initial draft of an appendix to Syntax that has the stuff
> needed for the MIME type.  I think that the equivalent for the
> Manchester Syntax would be very similar.
>
> peter

snip

> Applications which use this media type:
>    No widely deployed applications are known to use this media type. It
>    may be used by some web services and clients consuming their data.

Current doc says Protege 4 and Topbraid. I was surprised about
Topbraid. Is this verified? I sent a note to Jeremy Carroll to
confirm.

> Author/Change controller:
>    The OWL Functional Syntax is the product of the W3C OWL Working
>    Group; W3C reserves change control over this specification.

Current document says:

"Author/Change controller
The OWL functional-style Syntax is the product of the W3C OWL Working
Group in cooperation with OWL ontology tool builders; the
specification may be extended by groups of OWL tool builders; W3C
reserves change control over this specification.
"

I'm not sure what it means that the specification can be extended by
someone but that change control is in the hands of the W3C.

-Alan
Received on Tuesday, 11 November 2008 08:28:11 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 11 November 2008 08:28:12 GMT