- From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 03:27:28 -0500
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Cc: public-owl-wg@w3.org
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 10:13 AM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com> wrote: > > Here is my initial draft of an appendix to Syntax that has the stuff > needed for the MIME type. I think that the equivalent for the > Manchester Syntax would be very similar. > > peter snip > Applications which use this media type: > No widely deployed applications are known to use this media type. It > may be used by some web services and clients consuming their data. Current doc says Protege 4 and Topbraid. I was surprised about Topbraid. Is this verified? I sent a note to Jeremy Carroll to confirm. > Author/Change controller: > The OWL Functional Syntax is the product of the W3C OWL Working > Group; W3C reserves change control over this specification. Current document says: "Author/Change controller The OWL functional-style Syntax is the product of the W3C OWL Working Group in cooperation with OWL ontology tool builders; the specification may be extended by groups of OWL tool builders; W3C reserves change control over this specification. " I'm not sure what it means that the specification can be extended by someone but that change control is in the hands of the W3C. -Alan
Received on Tuesday, 11 November 2008 08:28:11 UTC