RE: Syntax: Table 3

Hello,

It is true that these resources are allowed in OWL ontologies; however, they do not belong to Table 3 of Syntax. This table simply
lists the vocabulary elements from the rdf, rdfs, owl, and xsd namespaces that have special meaning in OWL 2. That is, vocabulary
elements from Table 3 can be used in the ontologies in functional-style syntax even though they are in one of the built-in
namespaces.

In contrast, owl:DeprecatedClass and owl:DepretatedProperty cannot be used in ontologies in functional-style syntax. They are part
of the reserved vocabulary, just like, say, owl:someValuesFrom.

Regards,

	Boris

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-owl-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-owl-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Alan Ruttenberg
> Sent: 11 November 2008 07:54
> To: W3C OWL Working Group
> Subject: Syntax: Table 3
> 
> 
> is missing owl:DeprecatedClass, owl:DeprecatedProperty which are
> allowed in OWL ontologies according to table 16 of the RDF mapping.
> 
> -Alan