- From: Boris Motik <boris.motik@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 09:33:29 -0000
- To: "'Alan Ruttenberg'" <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>, "'W3C OWL Working Group'" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Hello, It is true that these resources are allowed in OWL ontologies; however, they do not belong to Table 3 of Syntax. This table simply lists the vocabulary elements from the rdf, rdfs, owl, and xsd namespaces that have special meaning in OWL 2. That is, vocabulary elements from Table 3 can be used in the ontologies in functional-style syntax even though they are in one of the built-in namespaces. In contrast, owl:DeprecatedClass and owl:DepretatedProperty cannot be used in ontologies in functional-style syntax. They are part of the reserved vocabulary, just like, say, owl:someValuesFrom. Regards, Boris > -----Original Message----- > From: public-owl-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-owl-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Alan Ruttenberg > Sent: 11 November 2008 07:54 > To: W3C OWL Working Group > Subject: Syntax: Table 3 > > > is missing owl:DeprecatedClass, owl:DeprecatedProperty which are > allowed in OWL ontologies according to table 16 of the RDF mapping. > > -Alan
Received on Tuesday, 11 November 2008 09:34:11 UTC