W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > February 2008

Re: ISSUE-95 (Datatype-facet compatibility in DatatypeRestriction): No compatibility restrictions between the datatype being restricted and the facets in the DatatypeRestriction construct

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 13:55:15 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <20080227.135515.248000830.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
To: boris.motik@comlab.ox.ac.uk
Cc: public-owl-wg@w3.org

From: "Boris Motik" <boris.motik@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
Subject: RE: ISSUE-95 (Datatype-facet compatibility in DatatypeRestriction): No compatibility restrictions between the datatype being restricted and the facets in the DatatypeRestriction construct
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 18:27:10 -0000

> Hello,
> 
> OK, some adjustments to the resolution were indeed needed in the other
> documents. I'm sorry for overlooking that initially. Here are
> the diffs for the syntax and the semantics document:
> 
> RDF mapping:
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/index.php?title=Mapping_to_RDF_Graphs
> <http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/index.php?title=Mapping_to_RDF_Graphs&diff=3522&oldid=3520>
> &diff=3522&oldid=3520
> 
> Semantics:
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/index.php?title=Semantics
> <http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/index.php?title=Semantics&diff=3519&oldid=3500>
> &diff=3519&oldid=3500
> 
> Please let me know what you think.
> 
> Regards,
> 
>             Boris

Aside from the extra blank lines in the email, this all looks fine.

peter
Received on Wednesday, 27 February 2008 18:55:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 27 February 2008 18:55:32 GMT