W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > February 2008

Re: more FPWDs?

From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 14:52:10 +0000
Message-Id: <35229B1E-24F4-4920-A550-D80FED65BB82@cs.man.ac.uk>
Cc: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>, public-owl-wg@w3.org
To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>

On 27 Feb 2008, at 14:43, Jeremy Carroll wrote:

> Inter-op would argue for an XSLT 1.0 transform that probably can be  
> done, but it may be easier to have an XSLT 2.0 transform.

Thinking about it, the trickiest bit will be dealing with URIs and  
CURIEs. Having to write a relative URI resolver will be annoying (but  
it's been done...there are RDF/XML parsers in XSLT)

> I tend to agree with Bijan's judgement that in principle this is  
> possible (although I would expect corner cases which don't work,  
> e.g. a property http://example.org/000)

Well, this is a case where the RDF/XML can't rep it anyway, so that's  
fine (or, rather, an instance of a known limitation of the target  

Received on Wednesday, 27 February 2008 14:50:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:42:02 UTC