W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > February 2008

Re: A thought on fragments and rec-track

From: Uli Sattler <sattler@cs.man.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 10:48:42 +0000
Message-Id: <6A1194C4-14AD-44A2-893C-B72F0162BC60@cs.man.ac.uk>
Cc: Carsten Lutz <clu@tcs.inf.tu-dresden.de>, Vojtech Svatek <Svatek@vse.cz>, public-owl-wg@w3.org
To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>

On 15 Feb 2008, at 10:27, Jeremy Carroll wrote:

> Carsten Lutz wrote:
>>  And it should also be said that a lot of input from 1)
>> went into the original proposal of OWL 1.1 that the WG started off
>> with.
> I remain frustrated that this input has not been carried forward in  
> a use case and requirements document. As is, it is a private mantra  
> amongst some in the group that the OWL 1.1 design is based on real  
> use cases - but there appears to be no easily accesible audit trail  
> that exposes that.

hm, we have definitely not kept them secret/private but desribed them  
in various papers. Anyway, we could easily move some of our QCR and  
subproperty chains use cases/stories/work around design patterns into  
a wiki page...would this help? Cheers, Uli

> Jeremy
Received on Friday, 15 February 2008 10:48:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:42:02 UTC