- From: Uli Sattler <sattler@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 10:48:42 +0000
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: Carsten Lutz <clu@tcs.inf.tu-dresden.de>, Vojtech Svatek <Svatek@vse.cz>, public-owl-wg@w3.org
On 15 Feb 2008, at 10:27, Jeremy Carroll wrote: > > Carsten Lutz wrote: >> And it should also be said that a lot of input from 1) >> went into the original proposal of OWL 1.1 that the WG started off >> with. > > I remain frustrated that this input has not been carried forward in > a use case and requirements document. As is, it is a private mantra > amongst some in the group that the OWL 1.1 design is based on real > use cases - but there appears to be no easily accesible audit trail > that exposes that. hm, we have definitely not kept them secret/private but desribed them in various papers. Anyway, we could easily move some of our QCR and subproperty chains use cases/stories/work around design patterns into a wiki page...would this help? Cheers, Uli > > Jeremy > > >
Received on Friday, 15 February 2008 10:48:06 UTC