W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > February 2008

Re: A thought on fragments and rec-track

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 10:27:02 +0000
Message-ID: <47B568F6.9020403@hpl.hp.com>
To: Carsten Lutz <clu@tcs.inf.tu-dresden.de>
CC: Vojtech Svatek <Svatek@vse.cz>, public-owl-wg@w3.org

Carsten Lutz wrote:
>  And it should also be said that a lot of input from 1)
> went into the original proposal of OWL 1.1 that the WG started off
> with.
> 

I remain frustrated that this input has not been carried forward in a 
use case and requirements document. As is, it is a private mantra 
amongst some in the group that the OWL 1.1 design is based on real use 
cases - but there appears to be no easily accesible audit trail that 
exposes that.

Jeremy
Received on Friday, 15 February 2008 10:27:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 15 February 2008 10:27:33 GMT