- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 10:27:02 +0000
- To: Carsten Lutz <clu@tcs.inf.tu-dresden.de>
- CC: Vojtech Svatek <Svatek@vse.cz>, public-owl-wg@w3.org
Carsten Lutz wrote: > And it should also be said that a lot of input from 1) > went into the original proposal of OWL 1.1 that the WG started off > with. > I remain frustrated that this input has not been carried forward in a use case and requirements document. As is, it is a private mantra amongst some in the group that the OWL 1.1 design is based on real use cases - but there appears to be no easily accesible audit trail that exposes that. Jeremy
Received on Friday, 15 February 2008 10:27:32 UTC