W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > February 2008

Re: A thought on fragments and rec-track

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 12:02:43 +0000
Message-ID: <47B57F63.9000303@hpl.hp.com>
To: Uli Sattler <sattler@cs.man.ac.uk>
CC: Carsten Lutz <clu@tcs.inf.tu-dresden.de>, Vojtech Svatek <Svatek@vse.cz>, public-owl-wg@w3.org

Uli Sattler wrote:
> On 15 Feb 2008, at 10:27, Jeremy Carroll wrote:
>> Carsten Lutz wrote:
>>>  And it should also be said that a lot of input from 1)
>>> went into the original proposal of OWL 1.1 that the WG started off
>>> with.
>> I remain frustrated that this input has not been carried forward in a 
>> use case and requirements document. As is, it is a private mantra 
>> amongst some in the group that the OWL 1.1 design is based on real use 
>> cases - but there appears to be no easily accesible audit trail that 
>> exposes that.
> hm, we have definitely not kept them secret/private but desribed them in 
> various papers.

I was not trying to suggest they were secret - more that the audit trail 
of how the current design relates to the use cases, and what the use 
cases are, could be more transparent.

> Anyway, we could easily move some of our QCR and 
> subproperty chains use cases/stories/work around design patterns into a 
> wiki page...would this help? Cheers, Uli

I would find that helpful.

Received on Friday, 15 February 2008 12:03:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:42:02 UTC