- From: <Dlmcg1@aol.com>
- Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 01:54:33 EST
- To: alanruttenberg@gmail.com, public-owl-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <bdb.24566fe7.34dab3a9@aol.com>
i expect to be in the air during the call tomorrow (and updated the page to
reflect that) but have a couple of comments related to the discussion topics.
on fragments, my main concerns are that
(1) people who previously used owl lite can still use it. peter points out
that it is still a subset of owl-dl so those users should be ok. that
probably works. i suggest in our documentation for changes from owl 1.0 to owl
1.1, we mention this explicitly.
(2) we have at least one fragment that is simpler than all of owl-dl that is
a starting point for at least one class of users. i found this very useful
getting people started using owl lite with owl 1.0.... many i started on
owl lite did end up moving to owl dl as they discovered value and became more
comfortable with the language. i expect it to be even more important with owl
1.1 since owl dl 1.1 has even more in it (which many people believe rightly
so is a good thing) than owl dl 1.0, but that just means that it may be
viewed as even more complex by many potential new users.
on owl full, my main concern is that people who need to use classes as
instances have some option for doing that in the owl 1.1 world.
on rich annotations, my main request is that owl 1.1 allows me to have
annotations on annotations. (i get that in peter's proposal 2a so that is one
proposal i like)
deborah
In a message dated 2/5/2008 12:59:31 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
alanruttenberg@gmail.com writes:
I've rearranged a bit to front load the discussion of OWL 1.1 Full to
accommodate Jeremy's and Peter's Schedules.
-Alan
(I still have to check for actions that might have fallen through the
tracker fencepost bug)
Agenda
* Admin (10 min)
* Roll call
* Agenda amendments
* PROPOSED: Accept [[Teleconference.2008.01.30/Minutes|Previous
Minutes]]
* General Discussion (40 min)
* [[Full|'''OWL 1.1 Full''']]
* Action items status (10 min)
* [http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/tracker/actions/pendingreview
Pending Review Actions]
* {{action|54}} Definition of OWL Prime/Zhe Wu
* {{action|67}} Lead effort on formulating some examples on b-
nodes issues and their impact on users/Jeff Pan
* {{action|68}} Respond to boris's parsing idea by e-mail/Jeremy
Carroll
* {{action|71}} Put his use case for punning onto a wiki page/
Boris Motik
* {{action|74}} Edit references in syntax to address addison's
bcp47 comment/Jeremy Carroll
* {{action|75}} Write proposal to resolve 90 to drop deprecation
and document in changes
* {{action|77}} Send an e-mail to the list with ideas on how to
bridge DLP and OWL Prime/Boris Motik
* {{action|39}} Imports proposal 1
* [http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/tracker/actions/overdue Due and
overdue Actions]
* {{action|42}} Improve examples for rich annotations./Bijan Parsia
* {{action|43}} Develop scripts to extract test cases from wiki,
coordinating with Bijan, Jeremy, Alan./Sandro Hawke
* {{action|62}} Add test guidelines to working group to agenda
for next week/Alan Ruttenberg
* {{action|70}} Put his use case for punning onto a wiki page/
Markus Krötzsch
* {{action|72}} Put his use case for punning onto a wiki page
(for reasoning associated with punned properties, and the question
about object data property punning vs annotation properties)/Alan
Ruttenberg
* Issues (25 min)
* Raised Issues
* Resolved Editorial Issues
* Issue Discussions
* [http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/tracker/issues/3 Issue 3] Lack of
anonymous individuals
* [http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/tracker/issues/68 Issue 68] mapping
rules are non-monotonic (more precisely, this relates to the mapping
of the qualified cardinality constructors)
* [http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/tracker/issues/91 Issue 91] Spec
lacks ontology properties (compatibility with OWL 1.0)
* [http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/tracker/issues/95 Issue 95] No
compatibility restrictions between the datatype being restricted and
the facets in the DatatypeRestriction construct
* Additional other business (5 min)
== Next Week(s) ==
* General Discussions (not necessarily in this order)
* [[Fragment_Proposals|Fragments and Conformance]] (To Be Continued)
* [[Imports]]
* OWL 1.1 Full (see [[RDF|Mapping to RDF]],
[[Compatibility_between_OWL_DL_and_OWL_Full|OWL DL/Full compatibility]])
* Versioning
* [[Easy_Keys|Easy Keys]]
* [[Annotation_System|Rich Annotations]]
== Regrets ==
* partial regrets: [[JeremyCarroll]] will leave at XX.45,
(conflicting engagement).
* partial regrets: [[Peter Patel-Schneider]] will leave about 75 min in
== Call in details ==
* Date of Call: Wednesday February 6, 2007
* Time of Call: [http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/?
year=2008&month=02&day=06&hour=18&min=0&sec=0 1800 UTC], 10:00AM
(West US), 1:00PM (East US), 18:00 (London), 19:00 (Paris)
* Dial-In #: +1.617.761.6200 (Cambridge, MA)
* Dial-In #: +33.4.89.06.34.99 (Nice, France)
* Dial-In #: +44.117.370.6152 (Bristol, UK)
* Participant Access Code: 69594# (OWLWG)
* IRC Channel: irc.w3.org port 6665 channel #owl ([irc:irc.w3.org:
6665/owl])
* Web-based IRC (member-only): http://www.w3.org/2001/01/cgi-irc
(Firefox IRC addon: [https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/
16 chatzilla])
* Duration: 90 minutes
* Chair: [[AlanRuttenberg|AlanRuttenberg]]
* Scribe: [[Scribe_List|Scribe List]]
* Link to Agenda: http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Teleconference.
2008.02.06/Agenda
**************Biggest Grammy Award surprises of all time on AOL Music.
(http://music.aol.com/grammys/pictures/never-won-a-grammy?NCID=aolcmp003000000025
48)
Received on Wednesday, 6 February 2008 06:54:54 UTC