W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > April 2008

Re: Plea to re-open issue-113 [WAS: Disposition of some recently raised issues]

From: Rinke Hoekstra <hoekstra@uva.nl>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 10:31:38 +0200
Cc: "Michael Schneider" <schneid@fzi.de>, "Alan Ruttenberg" <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>, <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <9ECA8EBE-983C-4947-93B9-ED329A74BB62@uva.nl>
To: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>

On 23 apr 2008, at 10:28, Bijan Parsia wrote:
>
> On 23 Apr 2008, at 09:18, Michael Schneider wrote:
> [snip]
>> So I plea the chairs to re-open this issue.
>>
>> My proposal would then be to
>>
>>  close ISSUE-113 as REJECTED
>>
>> optionally with a note in the documents that
>>
>>  "OWL-x conform" reasoners *MUST NOT* infer non-entailments of OWL-x.
>
> I thought, in essence, this was the F2F resolution.
>
> BTW, that's not new information. It was definitely discussed  
> multiple times.

I agree, no need to reopen the issue just to make this point. And, as  
a sidenote, it feels a bit weird to reject an issue that is phrased as  
a question. (i.e. that would mean that the WG felt the question was  
irrelevant)

-Rinke

-----------------------------------------------
Drs. Rinke Hoekstra

Email: hoekstra@uva.nl    Skype:  rinkehoekstra
Phone: +31-20-5253499     Fax:   +31-20-5253495
Web:   http://www.leibnizcenter.org/users/rinke

Leibniz Center for Law,          Faculty of Law
University of Amsterdam,            PO Box 1030
1000 BA  Amsterdam,             The Netherlands
-----------------------------------------------
Received on Wednesday, 23 April 2008 08:32:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 23 April 2008 08:32:18 GMT