Re: Plea to re-open issue-113 [WAS: Disposition of some recently raised issues]

On 23 Apr 2008, at 09:18, Michael Schneider wrote:
[snip]
> So I plea the chairs to re-open this issue.
>
> My proposal would then be to
>
>   close ISSUE-113 as REJECTED
>
> optionally with a note in the documents that
>
>   "OWL-x conform" reasoners *MUST NOT* infer non-entailments of OWL-x.

I thought, in essence, this was the F2F resolution.

BTW, that's not new information. It was definitely discussed multiple  
times.

Cheers,
Bijan.