Re: Plea to re-open issue-113 [WAS: Disposition of some recently raised issues]

Bijan Parsia wrote:

>>   "OWL-x conform" reasoners *MUST NOT* infer non-entailments of OWL-x.
> 
> I thought, in essence, this was the F2F resolution.
> 

me too

I hope there is somewhere to record my -epsilon .... :)

J

Received on Wednesday, 23 April 2008 08:35:14 UTC